License to speak

In the past we’ve used the analogy of acquiring languages as being like learning to swim. Is it best to jump in the deep end of the pool with no support? Is it practical to learn the techniques and physics of swimming before you get into the pool? Can a spray bottle simulate the same experience as being in water?

You can see our ever expanding Language Acquisition memes here.

Recently, we created this new meme with a new analogy: You don’t need to know how an engine works to drive a car. And you don’t need to understand grammar rules to speak a language.Learning Language and drivingImagine you are a sixteen year old. What do you want to do? Drive!  You get your driver’s permit and you start driving… in parking lots at first, then local streets, and finally highways. You are always accompanied by an experienced driver.

Before you get your license you don’t learn how to be a mechanic. You don’t study the mechanics of the car engine. You’re satisfied with the simple information like how to fill the gas tank and where to put the wiper fluid.

Very few students are interested in the mechanics at this point. But of course, some students will be. Some students may take shop-class and learn how to change the oil and more detailed engine-related work. But the average teenager doesn’t care. They want to drive. They want to use their license to get from Point A to Point B.

So how does this relate to language? Our students want to speak the language! They don’t care about the grammar details. Just like a student isn’t going to be a better driver by studying the engine (what makes the car run!) a language student is not going to be a better speaker by first focusing on the grammar. Grammar is certainly what makes the language flow, but our children who speak the language as toddlers don’t learn mechanics of the language first. That comes in time. Is their language perfect? No. Is it understood? Certainly. Does it get refined over time? Yes. Maybe that’s why they have bumper cars.


I also want to be clear: I am not saying grammar is bad. No one is making that argument. I’m saying that instead of teaching a level 1/2 student all the different rules of ser and estar (and believe me, I used to do this!) that instead we let them test-drive the language while we are their GPS. We offer the road-side assistance and maps by providing them the necessary input (hearing the language used in proper context). They will hear the correct use of “ser” and “estar”. Are they going to mix it up at first? Absolutely! Do I still understand them if they say “El carpeta es debajo del libros?” Yes! Encourage them. Recast, “Oh sí, yo veo que la carpeta está debajo de los libros” and overtime they will make less mistakes, but they will be more willing to stay on the highway instead of Exit at the first off-ramp after level 2.

Language is a highway. It opens up the world to students. They can communicate with people who are in a different area. We need to encourage them to stay on the road- keep learning. Let them experience language with the windows down and their hair blowing in the wind. They don’t want to be in a dark shoproom staring underneath the hood.

What do you think of this analogy? Would love to hear your thoughts: Comment below!

 

About SpanishPlans

Spanish Educator, with focus on acquisition Educator Enthusiast I love learning about and sharing culture.
This entry was posted in Discussion/Methodology and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Share your ideas!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.